2006RUS

Freedoms Decline Partly From Entertainment

Many Are Learning About Entertainment and the Dangers Posed to Freedom That Come From Spending Too Much Time Observing Fake Life Instead of Living Real Life.

We all live stressful lives and this is one reason we are interested about entertainment. When we return home from a hard-day’s work, we often relax in front of the TV, so we can quietly sit and let the entertainment think for us.

Entertainment is great and it helps us to relax and unwind. There are more TV channels than ever because of this, so many people sit on their butts all day that they get very fat and are unable to move.

Entertainment does have a dark side, and this is because there is so much entertainment available it is making the population stupid. Many of these TV shows are addictive and you will find that some peoples’ lives revolve completely around the TV.

Entertainment Distracts Masses From Reality

TV and films are making sure that we don’t have time to think about what’s really going on; everyone is too interested in watching TV. We no longer have the ability to think for ourselves because everything is given to us on a plate. There is of course one problem for the elite and that’s the internet.

The internet can be used for entertainment, and it can also be used to gather knowledge. As knowledge is power, the elite are not keen on us knowing any of this information which is why they plan to destroy the internet by 2012.

The elite are the mega-rich families from all over the world that are pushing for a single world government. It’s these rich families that have been behind many of the terrorist attacks to show us exactly why we need to do something to protect this country. It’s also the elite that have drummed up the idea of global warming so that we have to all pull together and do things as a team.

The elite have controlled the media for years, consolidation has meant that there are now only a few media companies. This means that the elite are able to control what people know and the TV is their greatest weapon. TV can be used to control us and make us stupid.

Social Engineering With Entertainment

TV is a science that the elite have been perfecting how to use for generations. TV programs are now used to condition us ever since birth. Think about the number of TV programs aimed at children these days; these are all created to mould the minds of the young and to stop us asking questions.

As a result of TV, we will be much more open to being told what to do. TV changes brain activity patterns and is actually a form of hypnosis.

Entertainment is not scary; it’s actually what’s going on behind the scenes that is. If you dig around and start asking questions about entertainment, then you will quickly learn that lots of things are going on that we don’t realize.

TV is keeping us from asking questions while genetically modified foods creep onto our shelves. Our constitutional rights are also being violated, but we sit down and take it. Entertainment is stopping us from thinking, and the likes of Rupert Murdoch, aka the Devil, are using it to their advantage.

It’s important to start asking what entertainment is doing to our society and to find out what is really going on. We simply don’t know enough about entertainment and what’s secretly happening behind the scenes.

Learn more about Mark A Cella. Stop by Mark A Cella’s site where you can find out all about Mark A Cella and his work.

categories: entertainment,freedom,civil rights,free press,media

Mark Cella on History of US Media Consolidation

Free Press Mourns the History of US Media Consolidation. As Major Corporations Absorb Outlets of Public Information, Media Becomes a Tool of Control by Elites.

There is a long history of US media consolidation that has turned one of our most valuable assets into a tool for the elite to manipulate and control Americans. One of the pillars of our democracy is free speech–the ability to disseminate varied opinions.

For all of its great intentions, media in this country is an oligarchy at best. Newspaper, radio stations and TV stations are by law, technology and logistics relegated to a defined area.

If you happen to live in a less populated area your media options may be limited to one outlet. The owners of these media outlets have full editorial control on what information is passed on the audience.

The history of US media consolidation is full of examples of owners manipulating information to influence the audience to suit their own needs. Whether the causes are political, racial or economically motivated, the power to edit the input we receive has a vast opportunity to change the way people think and see the world.

With help from friends in government, large media conglomerates were able to expand their control over media in land rush never before seen in the history of US media consolidation. Giant conglomerates now control wide swaths of television, print, radio, music, motion pictures and online media as part of their huge corporate holdings.

Firms like General Electric, Time Warner, Walt Disney, News Corp, CBS and Viacom have gained immense media holdings through acquisitions and mergers. These major, international companies only exist to increase their bottom lines.

To do so they must constantly appease advertisers and the government in the form of the FCC, which grants them licenses to broadcast. Issues such as diversity or free speech are not of concern to these media conglomerates.

Mark Cella on US Media

One of the most prominent examples of abuses in US media consolidation is the Hearst newspaper empire. In the late 19th century William Randolph Hearst began his media empire by acquiring multiple newspapers, the most talented writers and newest technology.

His media purchases went hand in hand with his political activism and aspirations. In order to out sell his competitors and drum up support for causes he supported Hearst had his writers use yellow journalism; sensationalized, trumped up and exaggerated stories in lieu of fact and news.

Hearst used his papers to gain support for war mongers in the government during their military actions in Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines.

Hearst also pushed his writers to promote stories linking minorities and their crimes to marijuana use. His motivation was two fold; the pulp of the marijuana plant, hemp, could be grown faster and harvested cheaper than his vast tracks of forests and he held Hispanic minorities in contempt.

His manipulation of the truth and spreading of lies helped anti-drug supporters pass the Marijuana Tax Act in 1937.

Mark Cella on History of US Media Consolidation

Even in its infancy the American motion picture industry played a defining role in the history of US media consolidation. It served as a template for future abuses.

The Motion Pictures Parents Company, also known as the Edison trust, was a trust that controlled the American movie business in the early 20th century. It included all of the major American movie companies, the biggest distributor in the country and the biggest supplier of film.

Through patents, litigation and limiting distribution channels they affectively controlled the new media of motion pictures in the country. Film options were limited to what they produced and competition was squashed.

US media consolidation reached its height in the motion picture industry with the Golden Age of Hollywood and the studio system. The studio system was put in place by the largest conglomerate film studios and would control the media of motion pictures with a vertically integrated oligarchy.

The studios would produce movies on their own lots and soundstages with personnel under long term contracts. Then the movies would be distributed through studio owned channels and played in studio owned movie theatres.

Both cases of media consolidation are prime examples of how a small but powerful group can effectively control the media available to the public. While both the Edison trust and the studio system were eventually stopped by court rulings their effect on the history of media consolidation was long lasting.

These vertically integrated systems would serve as models for modern conglomerates to consolidate media and power in the late 20th century. While we often tout our free speech to others around the world, like many of our other liberties is a shell of what it should be. Giant conglomerates control the media by limiting access by creating huge capital barriers to entrance.

The history of US media consolidation is full of these monopolies and oligarchies taking advantage of the American public to suit their own needs. When will it stop?

Learn more about Mark Cella. Stop by Mark Cella’s site where you can find out all about Mark Cella and his work.

categories: entertainment,free press,media

Mark Cella on Consumerism in America

What is Consumerism…Taking a Look at How Americans Are Overspent, in Debt and Broke Because They’re Manipulated Through Advertising.

The issue of American consumerism is being brought up more and more these days in light of the current financial crisis that the US is having.

But what is consumerism? Many people aren’t even really sure what consumerism really is. Consumerism can be defined in two ways. In economic terms, consumerism is the practice of people buying goods beyond the things that they need to survive.

For example, someone that buys wine to drink but has water or milk at home is engaging in consumerism because he or she doesn’t need the wine to drink but is buying just because he or she wants it and has the disposable income to purchase it.

Consumerism can also be defined as the practice of equating self worth and societal status with the purchase of goods and services.

What is consumerism in one country might not be the same as what is considered consumerism in another country based on the scarcity or abundance of resources in that particular country.

Mark Cella What is Consumerism?

US culture is almost 100% consumerist because many Americans engage in consumerism either by purchasing things that they don’t need to survive or by finding their own self worth or judging others by what they purchase and how much they consume.

Consumerism is a by product of unchecked capitalism and the current US economic crisis is a good example of what happens when unrestricted capitalism and unchecked consumerism are allowed to flourish in a society.

It’s the job of corporations and businesses to sell their products to consumers by any means necessary, which usually means advertising. Advertising creates the idea that a person’s worth or happiness is determined by what they own and how much they own.

The best example to illustrate this mode of thinking is the sale of lipsticks. Studies have shown that the worse off people are financially the higher the sales of lipsticks are.

Why?
Because women who are feeling bad about their economic situations and feeling their self worth take a dive when they lack the purchasing power to purchase bigger items will spend anywhere from $10 to $30 on a lipstick as a way to cheer themselves up.

Shopping has been promoted as a cure for women’s depression for years because in US culture an individual’s self worth, male or female, is tied to the possessions that they own.

Mark Cella on Consumerism

When that advertising created myth becomes the reality of a culture, the way it has in the US, economic disaster is sure to follow.

No economic system can survive when people purchase items that they can’t afford using credit and not worrying about they are going to pay for those purchases.

In the US consumers aren’t taught to spend their money responsibly, they are actually encouraged to live way beyond their means.

Unfortunately, many people do just that because they don’t know how to handle their money.

Predatory businesses that prey on unwary customers who are desperate to buy a little self-esteem or a little more social status are partly to blame for the economic downfall of the US but the consumers bears some of the responsibility, too.

It’s a consumer’s duty to be aware of his or her own financial situation and to not give in to the persuasive attempts of businesses to convince them to buy more stuff.

It can be tough to resist slick ads created by ad companies that are trained in the art of manipulation and psychological warfare but people need to realize that they are more than just consumers if they are going to find a way to survive the current economic crisis without falling into complete financial disaster as a result.

Visit Mark Cella’s site, www.Mark-Cella.com for more Mark Cella fun and serious matters.

Mark Cella on Aaron Russo 9-11

The Aaron Russo 9/11 Truth Comments Are Clear. The Maker of ‘Freedom to Fascism’ States Plain & Simply That the Twin Towers Were Felled by Controlled Demolition.

Academy Award nominee Aaron Russo 9/11 truth supporter and maker of such well known films as “Trading Places” and “The Rose,” makes no qualms about clearly denouncing the government for covering up the truth regarding the WTC collapse.

Mr. Russo has a well established career in mainstream film and culture so it is important to note that his mind was changed by overwhelming evidence he reviewed. “I’m very familiar with the 9/11 Truth movement. And I’m totally convinced that 9/11 was a fraud. There’s no doubt in my mind about that. At first I didn’t want to believe it. It’s such an ugly thing to believe…”

He goes on to explain how facts derived from video evidence that is available to us all make the truth about what happened very obvious.

“Most people believe that two buildings fell down that day in New York. … Three buildings went down that day, not two. And the third building was called Building number 7. And that was a 47-story office tower. It was pretty big. It wasn’t as big as the Twins, but it was still enormous. If you’ve ever seen the tape of it falling, you realize it’s a controlled demolition. It came straight down. Like you see those building in Vegas come down….”

Mark Cella Aaron Russo Conclusions

“PULL IT” COMMENT TELLS THE WHOLE STORY

He [Larry Silverstein, the building owner] said the Fire Department decided to pull it. Meaning to bring the building down. That’s what he said. Now, that was a big mistake on his part.”

“If you know anything about controlled demolitions you know for a building that size, it would take weeks, weeks to control demolition that building; to plant explosive on all the floors in all the right places. You couldn’t do it in four or five hours….”

“So, once you know that, and he admitted it was controlled demolition, then you realize that that building had been set up weeks, for weeks in advance of 9/11 ever happening….”

“If it was planned weeks in advance, then 9/11, the Twin Towers, was planned weeks in advance. It can’t be any other way. And that’s why the official government report of 9/11 never mentions Building 7. Because they have no explanation. They have no cover story. The other cover story is, ‘Oh, the planes hit it, so it went down’, which by the way, can’t be either. But rather than getting into all the details, Building 7 is the obvious answer.”

Mark Cella on Aaron Russo 9-11

RUSSO CONCLUDES US GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE

“So, when you ask me about 9/11 Truth movement, yes, I believe that and I believe it shows how evil and corrupt our government is.”

Comments like the ones above are truly pricless because they connect the dots into such a clear and easily readable picture that anyone reading them should be compelled to look further into what is really going on with this debate. Mr. Russo is not the only one making such clear statements, in fact there are thousands and thousands of individuals saying exactly the same thing.

These are not just showbiz types either, the Aaron Russo 9/11 truth sentiments are echoed by many many credible individuals from industries includng: physics, architecture, fire-fighting, college professors, eye-witnesses from the scene, all accounts add up to the same story which is radically different than the official explaination coming from Washington DC.

Mark Cella Aaron Russo Conclusions

So with such a large group of intelligent and well researched people reaching the same conclusion over and over again about what happened that day, it is a telling sign that the US Government continues to refuse a re-examination of the evidence. As the group grows larger the governemnt position will look weaker and weaker and eventually their hand may be forced.

So keep speaking out, keep standing up and when prominent figures like Mr. Russo come forward from mainstream society in support of this growing wave of awakening conscisousness about 9/11, rally behind them and the movement will grow in strength and size.

Visit Mark Cella’s site, www.Mark-Cella.com for more Mark Cella fun and serious matters.

South America will host the Summer Olympic Games for the first time in 2016, as Rio De Janeiro, Brazil was awarded the honor on Friday. Rio beat out the US choice of Chicago, Illinois along with Tokyo, Japan and Madrid, Spain to earn the right to host the games. Despite a high pressure effort from the American power elite–including President Barack Obama and TV gabfest queen Oprah Winfrey–Chicago was the first city eliminated from contention. Tokyo was the next to go, before Rio got the nod over Madrid in the final round of balloting.

Bookmakers offered odds on the host city choice, with Rio listed as second favorite at +200. Chicago had been the wagering favorite at most books, particularly after President Obama got involved personally in the US bid effort. Chicago was bet as high as a -300 favorite, while Madrid and Tokyo were priced in the +250 range. Some suggest that Tokyo didnt deserve to have such short odds, but was the beneficiary of regional pride from the notoriously enthusiastic betting population of Japan.

Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, President of Brazil, got the better of his US counterpart with a passionate speech that stood in marked contrast to Obamas typically baleful collection of talking points;

“It is a time to address this imbalance. It is time to light the Olympic cauldron in a tropical country.”

The Olympic committee was apparently swayed by this presentation and paid no mind to Rios many downsides. It is without a doubt the most dangerous of the finalist cities, where drug cartels and armed bands of thugs roam without impunity. Well do to Rio citizens are used to removing watches and jewelry before they drive anywhere lest they be targeted by carjacking brigands. Rios murder rate is also one of the highest in the world. Brazilian bid officials have stressed that security will be a priority at the games and it better be lest the Olympics turn into a bloodbath. For the time being, however, the mood in Rio was one of celebration with over 50,000 residents dancing and partying in the streets.

Some IOC members suggested that the summary dismissal of Chicagos bid was more of a rebuke of the notoriously corrupt USOC. The last two Olympics held in the US were tainted by crime and corruption. The’96 Atlanta Olympics were disrupted by a terrorist bombing, while the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Games were marred by a well known bribery and corruption scandal.

Ross Everett is a freelance sports writer and noted authority on football betting. His writing has appeared on a variety of sports sites including sportsbooks and sportsbook directory sites. He lives in Las Vegas, Nevada with three Jack Russell Terriers and an emu. He is currently working on an autobiography of former energy secretary Donald Hodell.

categories: Olympics,sports,recreation,entertainment,business,marketing,travel,leisure,politics

Alexis Arguello, one of the greatest boxers to ever compete , was found dead in his Managua, Nicaragua home in early July of an apparent suicide. He was 57 years old. Arguello was found with a gunshot wound to his chest, but his high political stature in the country meant that an investigation would be forthcoming to verify that it was indeed self inflected. Arguello was the mayor of Nicaragua’s capital city at the time of his death.

Known for his class outside the ring as much for his tenacity inside the ring, hes best known to casual fight fans for his epic war in’82 with Aaron The Hawk Pryor when he moved up in weight after dominating at lighter weight classes. Ring Magazine not only named it Fight of the Year, but later would dub it Fight of the Decade. Promoter Bob Arum offered these thoughts on Pryor/Arguello:

“It was a brutal, brutal fight. That was something I will never, ever forget as long as I live. That was one of the most memorable fights I ever did.”

While the first Pryor fight may have brought him the most mainstream notoriety, boxing cognoscenti are aware that Arguello is arguably the best lightweight and junior lightweight in the history of the sport. Arguello never lost a fight at-0 pounds and would end his career with an astounding 82-8 record with 65 knockouts and championships in three different weight classes. At the time, he was only the sixth man in boxing history to hold title belts at three different weights.

Ironically, Arguellos career didn’t get off to a good start and he lost his debut in’68 via first round TKO. He won his next three fights, before losing again via unanimous decision to another lower tier foe in his native country. After that, he seldom lost again and would go on to be respected as one of the best pound for pound fighters of his day. He was at his best against his toughest adversaries including Ray Mancini, Bobby Chacon and Ruben Olivares. Bob Arum remembered him not only as a great fighter, but as a great man:

“Not only was he one of the greatest fighters I’ve ever seen, he was the most intelligent fighter. He was a ring tactician. Every move was thought out. And he was a wonderful, wonderful person.”

The articulate, intelligent Arguello was also a quote machine on the fight game and how champions should conduct themselves. Here, he speaks of his attitude toward his opponents:

“Of course after the fight you want to make sure that you’re okay and so is the other guy, its a brotherhood in there, so you want to make sure everyone is okay after the war is over.”

Arguello didn’t fight for his first title until he’d had 58 fights, and would frequently admonish boxers who didn’t show the same respect for the sport or their status as champion:

“When you won that title you should know now that you are representing a whole country or nation with your actions and you are now in a glass house or under a microscope and you better be ready to make your people proud.”

Arguello loved boxing and fought to protect it from those who would undermine its greatness:

“I respect boxing because it has given me so much and thats why I will never allow anyone to mistreat the sport of boxing if I can help it.”

While the modest, dignified Arguello would never say it himself he also gave back immeasurably to the sport of boxing with his grace, intelligence, talent and toughness.

Ross Everett is a freelance sports writer and respected authority on Super Bowl betting. His writing has appeared on a variety of sports sites including sports news and Super Bowl odds sites. He lives in Southern Nevada with three Jack Russell Terriers and an emu. He is currently working on an autobiography of former interior secretary James Watt.

categories: boxing,sports,recreation,entertainment,hobbies,history,celebrities,politics